• Skip to main content
  • LOG IN
  • REGISTER
Coventor_New_LogoCoventor_New_LogoCoventor_New_LogoCoventor_New_Logo
  • COMPANY
    • ABOUT
    • CAREERS
    • PRESS RELEASE
    • PRESS COVERAGE
    • EVENTS
  • PRODUCTS
    • SEMulator3D®
      Semiconductor Process Modeling
    • CoventorMP®
      MEMS Design Automation
      • CoventorWare®
      • MEMS+®
  • SOLUTIONS
    • SEMICONDUCTOR SOLUTIONS
    • MEMS SOLUTIONS
  • RESOURCES
    • CASE STUDIES
    • BLOG
    • VIDEOS
  • CONTACT
  • SUPPORT
Contact Us
✕
  • Home
  • Coventor Blog
  • Don’t miss new Cloud-Based 3D Design-Technology Checking (3D-DTC) demo at DAC!
20nm SRAM Example
SEMulator3D 5.0 – It’s COMING!!!
May 15, 2015
Frequency response of 3D model of laterally vibrating resonator (LVR) similar to design from 2013 MTT paper by Gong and Piazza. A conventional frequency sweep (red circles) does not resolve spurs or the main resonance compared to the FastPZE simulation (black line). Both simulations took the same amount of simulation time. Achieving similar resolution with the conventional algorithm would have required 28X more computation time.
Collaboration Brings Fast Analysis to Acoustic Resonator Design
June 22, 2015

Don’t miss new Cloud-Based 3D Design-Technology Checking (3D-DTC) demo at DAC!

Published by Coventor at June 9, 2015
Categories
  • Coventor Blog
Tags
  • DTCO (Design Technology Co-Optimization)
  • SEMulator3D
3d DTC Concept

3d DTC Concept

DAC 2015 is in full swing in San Francisco this week, and Coventor is there again. But this year, we’re also doing a special joint demonstration with Silicon Cloud International. This demonstration combines the power of Coventor’s SEMulator3D Virtual Fabrication platform with broad parallel computing offered by Silicon Cloud to produce a whole new capability that we call “3D Design-Technology Checking” or 3D-DTC for short (not DRC!).

The motivation for 3D-DTC is clear. We hear it loud and clear from the semiconductor industry: 2D DRC alone is not good enough to ensure first-time product yield, especially for early technology adopters. Early 2D DRC decks are immature, incomplete and in the new 3D, multi-patterning era, incomprehensible. This punishes everyone in the ecosystem. PDKs are stuck between designers demanding density and technologists that aren’t finished developing the process. Designers can’t design with these decks, but also can’t have confidence that their designs will yield. The foundry gets squeezed from all sides, and tries to compromise through a process of Design-Technology Co-Optimization (DTCO), but most of this is done through empirical data or guesswork.

SEMulator3D enables process-predictive virtual fabrication of any design in any process flow. This has been shown in many different applications, so I’m not going to waste time on the fundamentals here. Using SEMulator3D’s Automation features, users can easily virtual fabricate hundreds or thousands of models representing process or design variations, and then check them in true 3D space for critical yield criteria. The broad computational resource added by Silicon Cloud allows this to be done across a huge process space in a very short time. This is the answer to the escapes of 2D DRC… 3D-DTC!!!

3d DTC Concept
3d DTC Concept

In the DAC demonstration, a single design construct is analyzed: A pair of semi-isolated M2 lines, connected to dense M1 wiring with a staggered V1 configuration. This design is virtually fabricated in a 10nm-like BEOL technology, complete with Trench-First SADP Mx patterning, LELE Vx patterning and advanced metallization. By varying lithography, deposition and etch processes, we easily see where this design construct is subject to yield-limiting mechanisms. We only used a small portion of the cloud (we had to leave some free for other software demos!), but were able to run 89 virtual DOE wafers through the full process flow and a suite of 3D-DTC rules in just over an hour. And, we got tremendously valuable information about the Design-Technology sensitivities of this structure, such as the points of Minimum Insulator failure (a key reliability metric) and Minimum Metallization failures (a key resistance and reliability metric)… despite being 2D DRC clean!

Automated 3D DTC
Automated 3D DTC
  • In my previous life as an integrator, this would have required ~200 real wafers in the fab (at a cost of ~$1M) over the course of experiments that would take a few months;
  • If we had released the rest of the cloud resources on this experiment, it would have completed in 11 minutes!

It’s clear to me that 3D-DTC represents the future of Design-Technology Co-Optimization that’s required for complex designs in advanced technologies. You can see the first cloud-based demonstration of 3D-DTC at DAC right now. The 3D-DTC demonstrations will continue throughout the exhibition at the Silicon Cloud International booth (#3333), so head over to the Moscone Center ASAP!

Share
Coventor
Coventor

Related posts

Picture of a young man using virtual reality glasses from the 2018 movie “Ready Player One” from Warner Bros.

An Explanation of the Metaverse and 5 MEMS Technologies Solutions That Will Soon Help Make It Happen

January 18, 2023

An Explanation of the Metaverse and 5 MEMS Technologies Solutions That Will Soon Help Make It Happen


Read more - An Explanation of the Metaverse and 5 MEMS Technologies Solutions That Will Soon Help Make It Happen
Figure 4 displays a single image showing how surface roughness can get transferred to materials etched or deposited later. In this image, the surface roughness has led to scumming, which in turn caused lines to get shorted. The figure shows uneven lines due to surface roughness, with material left behind that crosses two of the lines and creates a short.

Figure 4: Surface roughness can get transferred to materials etched or deposited later. Here, the surface roughness has led to scumming, which in turn caused lines to get shorted.

January 13, 2023

Modeling of Line and Surface Roughness in Semiconductor Processing


Read more - Modeling of Line and Surface Roughness in Semiconductor Processing
Figure 2. Backside power delivery using buried power rails, based on [2] (not to scale).

Figure 2. Backside power delivery using buried power rails, based on [2] (not to scale).

December 19, 2022

The Other Side of the Wafer: The Latest Developments in Backside Power Delivery


Read more - The Other Side of the Wafer: The Latest Developments in Backside Power Delivery
Figure 1:   3D Gyroscope Model example with simulated pressure contours (left), and ambient cavity pressure vs. Q-factor graph with simulated and measured results (right) (courtesy: Murata)

Figure 1:   3D Gyroscope Model example with simulated pressure contours (left), and ambient cavity pressure vs. Q-factor graph with simulated and measured results (right) (courtesy: Murata)

November 28, 2022

Understanding Q-Factors in Gas Encapsulated MEMS Inertial Sensors


Read more - Understanding Q-Factors in Gas Encapsulated MEMS Inertial Sensors

Comments are closed.

Product Information

  • Product Offerings
  • Technical Support & Training
  • Licensing
  • System Requirements

Resources

  • Blog
  • Case Studies
  • Videos
  • 2018 MEMS Design Contest

Company

  • About
  • Press
  • Partners & Programs
  • Contact
© Copyright Coventor Inc., A Lam Research Company, All Rights Reserved
Privacy Policy • Terms of Use
Contact Us
  • LOG IN
  • REGISTER