• Skip to main content
  • LOG IN
  • REGISTER
Coventor_New_LogoCoventor_New_LogoCoventor_New_LogoCoventor_New_Logo
  • COMPANY
    • ABOUT
    • CAREERS
    • PRESS RELEASE
    • PRESS COVERAGE
    • EVENTS
  • PRODUCTS
    • SEMulator3D®
      Semiconductor Process Modeling
    • CoventorMP®
      MEMS Design Automation
      • CoventorWare®
      • MEMS+®
  • SOLUTIONS
    • SEMICONDUCTOR SOLUTIONS
    • MEMS SOLUTIONS
  • RESOURCES
    • CASE STUDIES
    • BLOG
    • VIDEOS
  • CONTACT
  • SUPPORT
Contact Us
✕
  • Home
  • Coventor Blog
  • Modeling as a Foundation for TSensors Acceleration
Breakthrough MEMS Models for System and IC Designers
September 7, 2014
Example of a 3D NAND flash memory array.
Defect Evolution in 3D NAND Flash
March 12, 2015

Modeling as a Foundation for TSensors Acceleration

Published by Coventor at November 26, 2014
Categories
  • Coventor Blog
Tags
  • CoventorMP
  • MEMS
Time required for transient simulation of a MEMS gyro with Coventor behavioral modeling approach (Architect3D until 2009 and MEMS+ thereafter)

Time required for transient simulation of a MEMS gyro with Coventor behavioral modeling approach (Architect3D until 2009 and MEMS+ thereafter)

I gave a talk with the same title as this blog at the TSensors Summit held in La Jolla, California on November 12-13. The ‘T’ in TSensors stands for Trillion Sensors and the TSensors Summit initiative is addressing the provocative question: what will it take to get to a worldwide market of a trillion sensors a year in the not-too-distant future, say 10 to 15 years from now. The TSensors initiative is being spearheaded by serial MEMS entrepreneur Janusz Bryzek who cites the book Abundance by Peter Diamandes and Steven Kotler as inspiration for TSensors. The key premise behind the book is that technology is advancing at such a fast rate, exponentially in fact, that we have the opportunity to provide abundant food, clean water, renewable energy and health care for everyone on earth within a generation. This is heady stuff, especially compared to the doom and gloom that pervades the daily news (if only political and cultural differences were as easy to resolve). Sensors of all types will play a key role in technological solutions to these pressing worldwide challenges.

At TSensors events, including this one, speakers have provided many examples of ways that sensors are key to abundance. For instance: low-cost biometric sensors and labs-on-chip could dramatically lower the cost of healthcare; miniature spectrometers could track food, water and air quality; moisture sensors in every crop row could be used to optimize and dramatically reduce agricultural use of fresh water; and so on. It’s clear that a lot more sensors will be needed to attain abundance, therefore one of the main aims of the TSensors initiative is to accelerate development of new sensors.

This brings me to the subject of my TSensors talk: how modeling can accelerate development of new sensors. In MEMS as well as any other fabrication technology one can imagine, sensor development involves a cycle of designing, building and testing. For CMOS and MEMS, this can be described as a “silicon learning cycle”. The problem is that silicon learning cycles are both time consuming and costly. The proposition is simple: if actual building and testing can be replaced with predictive modeling that takes much less time, sensor development time can be dramatically accelerated. I identified three kinds of modeling that together can provide a virtual learning environment for sensor development: device modeling, system modeling and process modeling. I then provided an example of each type of modeling from Coventor’s experience.

I’ll mention here just the device modeling example which demonstrates our own exponential trend in technology. Since 2001, we’ve benchmarked our MEMS simulation software (Architect3D in 2001 and MEMS+ since 2009) on the same transient simulation of a MEMS gyro. Over the years, we made many improvements to our algorithms and implementation, and also benefited from faster computers enabled by Moore’s Law. The graph below shows how the simulation time decreased dramatically over the years as a result of our efforts, from three and a half hours in 2001 to less than 7 seconds today. That’s an exponential rate of improvement of more than 2X per year! That rapid improvement rate is more than twice what can be explained by Moore’s Law alone, which predicts doubling of transistor density (and presumably compute power) every two years. Here’s the thing: I simply did not appreciate how much improvement we’d made until I looked at the historical trend. This type of exponential improvement in technology is exactly the underlying driver for the optimistic forecasts of Abundance. It wasn’t until I took a long-term historical perspective that I realized that Coventor has its own great example of the exponential technological advancement.

Time required for transient simulation of a MEMS gyro with Coventor behavioral modeling approach (Architect3D until 2009 and MEMS+ thereafter)
Time required for transient simulation of a MEMS gyro with Coventor behavioral modeling approach (Architect3D until 2009 and MEMS+ thereafter)
Share
Coventor
Coventor

Related posts

Picture of a young man using virtual reality glasses from the 2018 movie “Ready Player One” from Warner Bros.

An Explanation of the Metaverse and 5 MEMS Technologies Solutions That Will Soon Help Make It Happen

January 18, 2023

An Explanation of the Metaverse and 5 MEMS Technologies Solutions That Will Soon Help Make It Happen


Read more - An Explanation of the Metaverse and 5 MEMS Technologies Solutions That Will Soon Help Make It Happen
Figure 4 displays a single image showing how surface roughness can get transferred to materials etched or deposited later. In this image, the surface roughness has led to scumming, which in turn caused lines to get shorted. The figure shows uneven lines due to surface roughness, with material left behind that crosses two of the lines and creates a short.

Figure 4: Surface roughness can get transferred to materials etched or deposited later. Here, the surface roughness has led to scumming, which in turn caused lines to get shorted.

January 13, 2023

Modeling of Line and Surface Roughness in Semiconductor Processing


Read more - Modeling of Line and Surface Roughness in Semiconductor Processing
Figure 2. Backside power delivery using buried power rails, based on [2] (not to scale).

Figure 2. Backside power delivery using buried power rails, based on [2] (not to scale).

December 19, 2022

The Other Side of the Wafer: The Latest Developments in Backside Power Delivery


Read more - The Other Side of the Wafer: The Latest Developments in Backside Power Delivery
Figure 1:   3D Gyroscope Model example with simulated pressure contours (left), and ambient cavity pressure vs. Q-factor graph with simulated and measured results (right) (courtesy: Murata)

Figure 1:   3D Gyroscope Model example with simulated pressure contours (left), and ambient cavity pressure vs. Q-factor graph with simulated and measured results (right) (courtesy: Murata)

November 28, 2022

Understanding Q-Factors in Gas Encapsulated MEMS Inertial Sensors


Read more - Understanding Q-Factors in Gas Encapsulated MEMS Inertial Sensors

Comments are closed.

Product Information

  • Product Offerings
  • Technical Support & Training
  • Licensing
  • System Requirements

Resources

  • Blog
  • Case Studies
  • Videos
  • 2018 MEMS Design Contest

Company

  • About
  • Press
  • Partners & Programs
  • Contact
© Copyright Coventor Inc., A Lam Research Company, All Rights Reserved
Privacy Policy • Terms of Use
Contact Us
  • LOG IN
  • REGISTER