• Skip to main content
  • LOG IN
  • REGISTER
Coventor_New_LogoCoventor_New_LogoCoventor_New_LogoCoventor_New_Logo
  • COMPANY
    • ABOUT
    • CAREERS
    • PRESS RELEASE
    • PRESS COVERAGE
    • EVENTS
  • PRODUCTS
    • SEMulator3D®
      Semiconductor Process Modeling
    • CoventorMP®
      MEMS Design Automation
      • CoventorWare®
      • MEMS+®
  • SOLUTIONS
    • SEMICONDUCTOR SOLUTIONS
    • MEMS SOLUTIONS
  • RESOURCES
    • CASE STUDIES
    • BLOG
    • VIDEOS
  • CONTACT
  • SUPPORT
Contact Us
✕
  • Home
  • Coventor Blog
  • Modeling of Line and Surface Roughness in Semiconductor Processing
Figure 2. Backside power delivery using buried power rails, based on [2] (not to scale).
The Other Side of the Wafer: The Latest Developments in Backside Power Delivery
December 19, 2022
Picture of a young man using virtual reality glasses from the 2018 movie “Ready Player One” from Warner Bros.
An Explanation of the Metaverse and 5 MEMS Technologies Solutions That Will Soon Help Make It Happen
January 18, 2023

Modeling of Line and Surface Roughness in Semiconductor Processing

Published by Sumant Sarkar at January 13, 2023
Categories
  • Coventor Blog
Tags
  • Line Edge Roughness (LER)
  • SEMulator3D
Figure 4 displays a single image showing how surface roughness can get transferred to materials etched or deposited later. In this image, the surface roughness has led to scumming, which in turn caused lines to get shorted. The figure shows uneven lines due to surface roughness, with material left behind that crosses two of the lines and creates a short.

Figure 4: Surface roughness can get transferred to materials etched or deposited later. Here, the surface roughness has led to scumming, which in turn caused lines to get shorted.

Line edge roughness (LER) can occur during the exposure step in lithography [1-2]. Similarly, etch and deposition process steps can leave a roughness on semiconductor surfaces. LER is a stochastic (or random) process, and it can cause device defects and lead to variability in device performance. This effect is more pronounced in advanced technology nodes beyond 5 nm, as there is less tolerance for these types of variations as device dimensions shrink. Process window optimization studies can help integration engineers study LER and develop process specifications to achieve their targeted yield. These types of process window optimization studies can be automated and expedited using SEMulator3D® process modeling.

Figure 1 (a-c) illustrates how to incorporate LER in process modeling using SEMulator3D®. LER can be modeled in SEMulator3D using an Edge Noise option in the Expose Material step (which is part of the Lithography Process Library).  If LER is not included in the model, the patterned lines would be straight and devoid of any roughness [Figure 1 (d)].  These straight edges are unrealistic in a typical process flow. A more representative case of a typical patterned line with edge roughness is shown in Figure 1 (e), where Edge Noise was included in the model.

Figure 1: Three SEMulator3D software images and two 3D models are shown in this figure. Figures 1(a)-(c) display images taken from SEMulator3D with line edge roughness modeling options within the software (left, top right and center). Figures 1 (d) and 1 (e)) compare two 3D models. The model on the left (Figure 1d) displays straight lines with no line edge roughness. The 3D model on the right (Figure 1e) displays lines with line edge roughness using a Gaussian noise type setting (rms = 4 nm, Correlation length = 0.8 nm).

Figures 1: (a)-(c) Line edge roughness modeling options within SEMulator3D (left, top right and center). (d) A 3D model displaying straight lines with no line edge roughness. (e) A 3D model displaying lines with edge roughness using a Gaussian noise type setting (rms = 4 nm, Correlation length = 0.8 nm).

Next, we demonstrate how to simulate surface roughness. We start by using an etch step from the Process Library, and then choose the “Custom Loading Map” option in the Pattern Dependence model [Figure 2 (a)]. When the “Depth” option is selected, it allows the user to specify a Python module and class to determine the etch depth. This class option is required to have an associated array, and the values in this array control the etch depth at each point on the surface. [Figure 2 (b-d)]. The custom Python step can include entries to control the type of surface roughness formed. These entries include the roughness feature “count”, along with the mean and standard deviation of surface craters that comprise the surface roughness. The craters are polygon-shaped, and the number of vertices of these polygons can also be controlled by these entries.

Figure 2: Four SEMulator3D software images and three 3D models are shown in this figure. Figures 2(a)-(d) display images taken from SEMulator3D with line edge roughness modeling options within the software (left, top right and center). (a) In order to achieve surface roughness, an etch step with “Custom Loading Map” option can be used (upper left). (b-d) A custom Python step creates a .csv file that contains the etch depth at each point on the surface (center left and upper right figures) . Figure 2(e) displays three 3D models of surface roughness generated by the SEMulator3D software. The resulting surface roughness is shown in a 3D model of surface roughness for various roughness settings . Results for different values of the parameters are shown in Figure 3.

Figure 2: (a) In order to achieve surface roughness, an etch step with “Custom Loading Map” option can be used (upper left). (b-d) A custom Python step creates a .csv file that contains the etch depth at each point on the surface (center left and upper right figures) . (e) The resulting surface roughness (bottom figure), displaying a 3D model of surface roughness for various roughness settings) . Results for different values of the parameters are shown in Figure 3.

The surface roughness created by this process step will vary based upon the parameter values provided to the model. Figure 3 (a) displays 40 nm mean size roughness created during an etch step on a silicon dioxide surface. The values of the parameters can be chosen to improve the correlation between the model and actual wafer results [Figure 3 (a-d)]. Surface roughness often gets transferred to material etched or deposited later. As an example, surface roughness can lead to scumming[3] in photoresists, which in turn, can lead to shorts among lines (Figure 4).

Figure 3 displays four 3D images of surface roughness created using different settings in SEMulator3D. (a) (top left) Surface roughness achieved with a mean size setting of 40 nm and count of 1000. Different values were used for mean size and count of the craters that create the surface roughness in Figures (b) Size = 60, Count = 100 (c) Size = 10, Count = 10000 (d) Size = 4, Count = 100000 (Figure 3(b) is shown in the top right, and Figures 3(c) and 3(d) are shown in the bottom left and bottom right)

Figure 3: (a) (top left) Surface roughness achieved with a mean size setting of 40 nm and count of 1000. Different values were used for mean size and count of the craters that create the surface roughness in Figures (b) Size = 60, Count = 100 (c) Size = 10, Count = 10000 (d) Size = 4, Count = 100000 (Figure 3(b) is shown in the top right, and Figures 3(c) and 3(d) are shown in the bottom left and bottom right)

 

Figure 4 displays a single image showing how surface roughness can get transferred to materials etched or deposited later. In this image, the surface roughness has led to scumming, which in turn caused lines to get shorted. The figure shows uneven lines due to surface roughness, with material left behind that crosses two of the lines and creates a short.

Figure 4: Surface roughness can get transferred to materials etched or deposited later. Here, the surface roughness has led to scumming, which in turn caused lines to get shorted.

 

Conclusion

Virtual modeling and calibration of LER can be used to minimize the impact of LER as semiconductor device dimensions decrease.  Process window optimization studies in SEMulator3D can include LER effects, to improve both model accuracy and ultimately the calibration to measured results. Process window optimization modeling with LER can significantly improve the correlation between predicted yield and actual measured yield at advanced nodes, where sensitivity of these effects is most pronounced.   SEMulator3D® has the capability to accurately model both line and surface roughness issues, to help engineers better understand and control the consequences of LER during advanced device manufacturing.

References

[1] Lin, Q., Black, C. T., Detavernier, C., Gignac, L., Guarini, K., Herbst, B., … & Sanchez, M. I. (2003, June). Does line-edge roughness matter? : FEOL and BEOL perspectives. In Advances in Resist Technology and Processing XX (Vol. 5039, pp. 1076-1085). SPIE.

[2] Chen, Yu De. (2022, August 18). How does Line Edge Roughness (LER) affect Semiconductor Performance at Advanced Nodes? https://www.coventor.com/blog/how-does-line-edge-roughness-ler-affect-semiconductor-performance-at-advanced-nodes

[3] Sobieski, D., Wise, R., Pan, Y., Fried, D., Yu, J., & Shamma, N. (2019, March). EUV line-space pattern defect mitigation simulation using Coventor SEMulator3D to enable exposure dose reduction. In Advanced Etch Technology for Nanopatterning VIII (Vol. 10963, pp. 90-98). SPIE.

Share
Sumant Sarkar
Sumant Sarkar
Dr. Sumant Sarkar is a semiconductor process and integration (SPI) engineer at Lam Research. He has 18 years of experience in the software and analytics industry, including positions at Oracle and nanobi analytics from 1997 to 2015, after which he went back to graduate school. Dr. Sarkar joined Lam Research in March 2022, and is currently working for Lam’s SPI group in North America, where he is responsible for advanced nanotechnology development and process modeling projects with Lam’s key partners and customers. . He received a bachelor’s degree in EE from IIT Kharagpur, master’s degree in Nanotechnology from IISc Bengaluru, and a Ph.D. in Physics & Materials Science from Northern Arizona University, where he developed methods for achieving strong and controllable circular dichroism at ultraviolet wavelengths.

Related posts

Figure 1 displays a single cell of a conventional DRAM that consists of 2 Word Lines (WLs), a Bit Line (BL) and 2 Storage Node Contacts (SNC) in Figure 1(a). There are 3 images in the figure. The Saddle Fin is produced during the WL etch step (prior to WL metal deposition) and is located below the cell wordline (Figure 1(b), right center inside a yellow dotted circle). The Saddle Fin structure can be seen in detail by making a vertical cut in the wordline direction (Fig.1(b), right). During device simulation, the Saddle Fin performance can be measured by virtually cropping a transistor and adding ports at the Gate, Source and Drain after an SNC Process (Fig.1(c), showing the gate, source and drain).
May 30, 2023

Improving DRAM Device Performance Through Saddle Fin Process Optimization


Read more - Improving DRAM Device Performance Through Saddle Fin Process Optimization
Figure 6 (left to right): Different profiles using pattern dependence for the antenna and sharp head shapes. a) Antenna shape with POR flow (b) Antenna profile with a gate CD of 26nm (c) Sharp head profile with a gate CD of 28nm (d) Sharp head profile with an etch.

Figure 6 (left to right): Different profiles using pattern dependence for the antenna and sharp head shapes. a) Antenna shape with POR flow (b) Antenna profile with a gate CD of 26nm (c) Sharp head profile with a gate CD of 28nm (d) Sharp head profile with an etch.

April 13, 2023

The Impact of Metal Gate Recess Profile on Transistor Resistance and Capacitance


Read more - The Impact of Metal Gate Recess Profile on Transistor Resistance and Capacitance
Figure 1a (left) displays the process of performing Physical Vapor Deposition (PVD), including Cu bombardment and filling of voids. Figure 1b (right) displays the process of performing Ion Beam Etch (IBE), including ion beam bombardment, mask shadowing and etch regions.

Fig 1a Physical Vapor Deposition (PVD); Fig 1b Ion Beam Etch (IBE)

March 22, 2023

A Deposition and Etch Technique to Lower Resistance of Semiconductor Metal Lines


Read more - A Deposition and Etch Technique to Lower Resistance of Semiconductor Metal Lines
Left to right: SEMulator3D virtual structures of NON, Low K and Airgap spacers for a DRAM cell, with highlighted SiO2, Polysilicon, Silicon, Si3N4, TIN and W layers

Fig. 1: (a) NON, (b) Low k and (c) Airgap spacer

February 28, 2023

A Comparative Evaluation of DRAM bit-line spacer integration schemes


Read more - A Comparative Evaluation of DRAM bit-line spacer integration schemes

Comments are closed.

Product Information

  • Product Offerings
  • Technical Support & Training
  • Licensing
  • System Requirements

Resources

  • Blog
  • Case Studies
  • Videos
  • 2018 MEMS Design Contest

Company

  • About
  • Press
  • Partners & Programs
  • Contact
© Copyright Coventor Inc., A Lam Research Company, All Rights Reserved
Privacy Policy • Terms of Use
Contact Us
  • LOG IN
  • REGISTER