• Skip to main content
  • LOG IN
  • REGISTER
Coventor_New_LogoCoventor_New_LogoCoventor_New_LogoCoventor_New_Logo
  • COMPANY
    • ABOUT
    • CAREERS
    • PRESS RELEASE
    • PRESS COVERAGE
    • EVENTS
  • PRODUCTS
    • SEMulator3D®
      Semiconductor Process Modeling
    • CoventorMP®
      MEMS Design Automation
      • CoventorWare®
      • MEMS+®
  • SOLUTIONS
    • SEMICONDUCTOR SOLUTIONS
    • MEMS SOLUTIONS
  • RESOURCES
    • CASE STUDIES
    • BLOG
    • VIDEOS
  • CONTACT
  • SUPPORT
Contact Us
✕
  • Home
  • Coventor Blog
  • Overcoming RF MEMS Switch Development Challenges
Figure 2. Simulation results displaying 3 different etch processes followed by 4 different deposition processes
Using Virtual Process Libraries to Improve Semiconductor Manufacturing
May 27, 2021
Figure 3: On/off-state current distribution at fin bottom (top figures: no residue; bottom figure: with residue).
Using a Virtual DOE to Predict Process Windows and Device Performance of Advanced FinFET Technology
June 16, 2021

Overcoming RF MEMS Switch Development Challenges

Published by Gerold Schropfer at June 13, 2021
Categories
  • Coventor Blog
Tags
  • MEMS
  • MEMS RF Switch
  • MEMS+
Figure 2: 3D view of RF MEMS switch model, showing the deflection under residual stress [2]

Figure 2: 3D view of RF MEMS switch model, showing the deflection under residual stress [2]

There are a wide range of promising applications for RF MEMS switches, including use in tunable filters, antennas, tactile radio, and RF ID [1].  Why it is so difficult to develop these devices?

Challenges in RF MEMS Switch Design

There are several challenges that need to be overcome when designing an RF MEMS switch.  Mechanically, the device needs to withstand billions of actuation cycles, opening and closing the actuator in a highly reliable manner. Contact blocks are often employed to avoid direct contact between the electrodes.  It is also critical to understand the dynamic nonlinear behavior of the device. Pull-in, lift-off, and frequency hysteresis need to be optimized during device design to meet final product specifications.  Moreover, the transient behavior of an RF MEMS switch is very sensitive to device dimensions and process variability, making these parameters critical to performance and yield. RF MEMS switches also often rely on complex composite materials, such as stacks of metals and dielectrics, that exhibit fabrication induced residual stress and stress gradients. Each of these factors has a substantial impact on achieving final device performance and maintaining design specifications.

The dynamic behavior of a RF MEMS switch must be understood to not only design the best switch, but also to design the system around it.  The overall system includes the MEMS chip, the control electronics and integrated circuits, the RF components, and the packaging.  Optimizing the overall system is key to success, and requires a realistic (and not an idealistic) device and system model.

Solutions to the Challenges of RF MEMS Switch Design

Coventor’s MEMS+® is a transformational solution to solve these challenges. Three transformational capabilities in MEMS+ help overcome the challenges of RF MEMS switch design.

Transformation No 1 is the ability to capture transient switching behavior. MEMS+ enables high-fidelity models that predict detailed coupled physics performance, including the non-linear behavior caused by contact mechanics and hysteresis (see Figure 1). This provides an in depth understanding of pull-in and lift-off behavior, and a predictive, realistic understanding of how the switch will operate.

Figure 1: MEMS Tunable capacitor transient opening oscillations, displaying the match between Laser Doppler Vibrometer measurements (LVD) and a MEMS+ dynamic model [3, 4]

Figure 1: MEMS Tunable capacitor transient opening oscillations, displaying the match between Laser Doppler Vibrometer measurements (LVD) and a MEMS+ dynamic model [3, 4]

Transformation No 2 is the exploration of the design-technology space.  Compact models created in MEMS+ reduce simulation time from days to minutes.  These fast simulation times enable a broad exploration of the design space and device manufacturability.  Changes in geometry, process and material values can be quickly studied in design-of-experiments, improving the designer’s understanding of the trade-offs between device design (geometry) and technology (process, materials).  Reliability failures caused by design-process interactions can be uncovered at an early stage, accelerating the yield optimization process (see Figure 2).

Figure 2: 3D view of RF MEMS switch model, showing the deflection under residual stress [2]

Figure 2: 3D view of RF MEMS switch model, showing the deflection under residual stress [2]

Transformation No 3 is the ability to accurately simulate system-level behavior. MEMS+ models produce simulation results quickly and accurately, which is needed during system-level simulation. 3D multi-physics MEMS+ models can be brought directly into system-level modeling tools and electrical circuit simulators, enabling fast co-design of the RF MEMS switch with the surrounding circuitry and systems. These realistic MEMS+ device models can be used to optimize a complete product or system.   For example, a designer can explore the optimal voltage modulation at the actuation electrodes within a control circuit. Idealistic, simplified MEMS behavioral models used during system design can risk product underperformance or even complete failure.   With MEMS+, simulated results match measured values (see Figure 3).

Figure 3: Normalized capacitance variation as a function of the input power displayed in a system-level simulation, with simulated values (left) and measured values (right)  [4]

Figure 3: Normalized capacitance variation as a function of the input power displayed in a system-level simulation, with simulated values (left) and measured values (right)  [4]

References:

  1. https://www.coventor.com/blog/rf-mems-switches-understanding-their-operation-advantages-and-future/
  2. New Simulation and Experimental Methodology for Analyzing Pull-in and Release in MEMS Switches, M. Kamon, S. Maity, D. DeReus, Z. Zhang, S. Cunningham, S. Kim, J. McKillop, A. Morris, G. Lorenz, L. Daniel, IEEE Transducers 2013, Barcelona, SPAIN, 16-20 June 2013
  3. Dynamic Characterization of Tunable RF MEMS Products, Dana DeReus, Shawn Cunningham, Saravana Natarajan, Art Morris, Jeff Hilbert, IEEE MEMS 2014, san Francisco, USA, January 26-30, 2014
  4. Linearity and RF Power Handling on Capacitive RF MEMS Switches, David Molinero, Samira Aghaei, Arthur S. Morris, Shawn Cunningham , IEEE Transaction of Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol. 67, No 12, 2019
Share
Gerold Schropfer
Gerold Schropfer
Dr. Gerold Schröpfer is Technical Director for Europe and for the MEMS business operations worldwide. For the last ten years, Gerold has been responsible for overseeing Coventor’s European MEMS and semiconductor business activities, including the management of R&D programs, industrial and academic partnerships, and external business relationships. Dr. Schröpfer has more than 20 years of relevant experience in MEMS and semiconductor design, process development and EDA product development. Prior to his current position at Coventor, Gerold carried out pioneering work in the design and development of inertial, tire pressure and magnetic sensors at Sensitec and SensoNor (Infineon). Dr. Schröpfer holds a PhD in engineering science from the University of Neuchâtel (Switzerland) and Franche-Comté (France), as well as a degree in physics from the University of Giessen (Germany).

Related posts

Picture of a young man using virtual reality glasses from the 2018 movie “Ready Player One” from Warner Bros.

An Explanation of the Metaverse and 5 MEMS Technologies Solutions That Will Soon Help Make It Happen

January 18, 2023

An Explanation of the Metaverse and 5 MEMS Technologies Solutions That Will Soon Help Make It Happen


Read more - An Explanation of the Metaverse and 5 MEMS Technologies Solutions That Will Soon Help Make It Happen
Figure 4 displays a single image showing how surface roughness can get transferred to materials etched or deposited later. In this image, the surface roughness has led to scumming, which in turn caused lines to get shorted. The figure shows uneven lines due to surface roughness, with material left behind that crosses two of the lines and creates a short.

Figure 4: Surface roughness can get transferred to materials etched or deposited later. Here, the surface roughness has led to scumming, which in turn caused lines to get shorted.

January 13, 2023

Modeling of Line and Surface Roughness in Semiconductor Processing


Read more - Modeling of Line and Surface Roughness in Semiconductor Processing
Figure 2. Backside power delivery using buried power rails, based on [2] (not to scale).

Figure 2. Backside power delivery using buried power rails, based on [2] (not to scale).

December 19, 2022

The Other Side of the Wafer: The Latest Developments in Backside Power Delivery


Read more - The Other Side of the Wafer: The Latest Developments in Backside Power Delivery
Figure 1:   3D Gyroscope Model example with simulated pressure contours (left), and ambient cavity pressure vs. Q-factor graph with simulated and measured results (right) (courtesy: Murata)

Figure 1:   3D Gyroscope Model example with simulated pressure contours (left), and ambient cavity pressure vs. Q-factor graph with simulated and measured results (right) (courtesy: Murata)

November 28, 2022

Understanding Q-Factors in Gas Encapsulated MEMS Inertial Sensors


Read more - Understanding Q-Factors in Gas Encapsulated MEMS Inertial Sensors

Comments are closed.

Product Information

  • Product Offerings
  • Technical Support & Training
  • Licensing
  • System Requirements

Resources

  • Blog
  • Case Studies
  • Videos
  • 2018 MEMS Design Contest

Company

  • About
  • Press
  • Partners & Programs
  • Contact
© Copyright Coventor Inc., A Lam Research Company, All Rights Reserved
Privacy Policy • Terms of Use
Contact Us
  • LOG IN
  • REGISTER