• Skip to main content
  • LOG IN
  • REGISTER
Coventor_New_LogoCoventor_New_LogoCoventor_New_LogoCoventor_New_Logo
  • COMPANY
    • ABOUT
    • CAREERS
    • PRESS RELEASE
    • PRESS COVERAGE
    • EVENTS
  • PRODUCTS
    • SEMulator3D®
      Semiconductor Process Modeling
    • CoventorMP®
      MEMS Design Automation
      • CoventorWare®
      • MEMS+®
  • SOLUTIONS
    • SEMICONDUCTOR SOLUTIONS
    • MEMS SOLUTIONS
  • RESOURCES
    • CASE STUDIES
    • BLOG
    • VIDEOS
  • CONTACT
  • SUPPORT
Contact Us
✕
  • Home
  • Coventor Blog
  • RF MEMS Switches: Understanding their Operation, Advantages, and Future
Figure 2: Piezoelectric µ-mirror
Overview of Piezoelectric MEMS: Principles, Applications and the Future
April 29, 2021
Figure 2. Simulation results displaying 3 different etch processes followed by 4 different deposition processes
Using Virtual Process Libraries to Improve Semiconductor Manufacturing
May 27, 2021

RF MEMS Switches: Understanding their Operation, Advantages, and Future

Published by Coventor at May 20, 2021
Categories
  • Coventor Blog
Tags
  • CoventorMP
  • MEMS
  • MEMS RF Switch
Figure 4:  CoventorMP® model of bridge-type RF switch in its undeformed, “up” state

Figure 4:  CoventorMP® model of bridge-type RF switch in its undeformed, “up” state

RF MEMS switches are small, micromechanical switches that have low power consumption and can be produced using conventional MEMS fabrication technology. They are similar to a light switch in a room, where a contact is opened or closed to conduct a signal across the switch. In the case of RF MEMS devices, the mechanical components of the switch are only microns in size. Unlike a light switch, the signal being conducted in an RF MEMS switch is in the radio frequency range.

RF Switch Technology

RF switching can be accomplished using a number of different technologies. There are two main types of RF switches that compete with RF MEMS switches:  electro-mechanical RF switches and solid-state RF switches.  Solid state switches use semiconductor technologies to operate, such as silicon or PIN diodes, FETs (field-effect transistors) and hybrid technologies (which incorporate PINS and FETs) and are built using silicon-based substrates. RF MEMS switches compete with ever improving RF-SOI (Silicon on Insulator) based switches, which are the dominant solution in the market today.

There are numerous types of RF MEMS switches, and they can be actuated (or flipped) using different mechanisms. Electrostatic actuation is commonly used in RF MEMS switch designs, due to its low-power consumption and small size. MEMS switches can also be opened or closed using inertial, electromagnetic, electrothermal or piezoelectric force.

A typical “cantilever beam” RF MEMS switch is shown in Figures 1 & 2. In this configuration, a fixed beam is suspended over a substrate. When the beam is forced down, an electrode on the beam contacts an electrode on the substrate, putting the switch into the “on” state and completing the circuit.

Figure 1:  Cantilever beam type RF-MEMS switch

Figure 1:  Cantilever beam type RF-MEMS switch (Courtesy, Reference 1)

 

Figure 2:  Cantilever beam RF switch model from CoventorMP®, showing on and off actuation states

Figure 2:  Cantilever beam RF switch model from CoventorMP®, showing on and off actuation states

Capacitive MEMS RF Switches

The latest generation of RF MEMS switches are mostly capacitive-based devices. Capacitive switches work using capacitive coupling, and are well-suited to high-frequency RF applications. During operation, a force is applied to a beam suspended like a bridge across a substrate. When the beam is pulled down by a force (such as an electrostatic force), the beam contacts a dielectric on the substrate and the signal is terminated.   A cross-section of a “bridge” type capacitive switch is shown in Figure 3, with a CoventorMP® 3D model of a capacitive RF MEMS switch in its undeformed state shown in Figure 4.

Figure 3:  Bridge type capacitive RF-MEMS switch

Figure 3:  Bridge type capacitive RF-MEMS switch (Courtesy, Reference 1)

 

Figure 4:  CoventorMP® model of bridge-type RF switch in its undeformed, “up” state

Figure 4:  CoventorMP® model of bridge-type RF switch in its undeformed, “up” state

 

RF MEMS Commercialization

The development of RF MEMS switches started more than 20 years earlier, but market success was limited at the time. The main barrier to earlier commercialization was reliability.  RF switches need to survive billions of switching cycles.  It has been challenging to find materials that are hard enough to sustain a large number of switching cycles, while at the same time soft enough to make good contact when closed. RF MEMS switches (most notably, their electrodes) require a fabrication technology based upon composite layers of mechanical materials. The reliability of an RF MEMS switch is impacted by electrical and mechanical stress in these composite materials, along with temperature dependencies and sensitivity to shocks and vibrations.

There is a rising demand for RF MEMS switches and other RF MEMS devices in next generation telecommunication systems and smart phones. The market for RF MEMS devices is expected to increase approximately 100% between 2018 and 2024, according to a recent report from Yole Développement. Yole noted that developments in 5G communications will increase demand for MEMS-based devices such as RF MEMS BAW filters, due to a need for active antennas in 5G devices. In addition, RF MEMS oscillators will be used in the deployment of new base stations and edge computing linked to 5G.

Conclusion

Due to their mechanical nature, RF MEMS switches have several advantages over existing technologies, including a very low resistance when closed and very high resistance when open. RF-MEMS switches offer the advantages of small size, low power requirements, fast switching time, low signal loss, high off-state isolation, circuit-scale integration capabilities and others. RF-MEMS switches at frequencies in the range of tens of GHz will be widely used in future telecommunication systems, such as 5G mobile cellular communication, particularly as new manufacturing processes and materials become more readily available. RF MEMS devices, including RF MEMS switches, will experience dramatic growth as part of the next generation of 5G and other telecommunications systems.

To learn more about the design of RF MEMS switches, please click here.

References:

  1. Kurmendra, Dr; Kumar, R., “A review on RF micro-electro-mechanical-systems (MEMS) switch for radio frequency applications”. Microsystem Technology (2020).
  2. Cao, T.; Hu, T.; Zhao, Y., “Research Status and Development Trend of MEMS Switches: A Review”. Micromachines 2020, 11, 694.
  3. Yole Développement, “Status of the MEMS Industry 2019”
  4. https://www.globalspec.com/learnmore/telecommunications_networking/rf_microwave_wireless_components/rf_switches
Share
Coventor
Coventor

Related posts

Picture of a young man using virtual reality glasses from the 2018 movie “Ready Player One” from Warner Bros.

An Explanation of the Metaverse and 5 MEMS Technologies Solutions That Will Soon Help Make It Happen

January 18, 2023

An Explanation of the Metaverse and 5 MEMS Technologies Solutions That Will Soon Help Make It Happen


Read more - An Explanation of the Metaverse and 5 MEMS Technologies Solutions That Will Soon Help Make It Happen
Figure 4 displays a single image showing how surface roughness can get transferred to materials etched or deposited later. In this image, the surface roughness has led to scumming, which in turn caused lines to get shorted. The figure shows uneven lines due to surface roughness, with material left behind that crosses two of the lines and creates a short.

Figure 4: Surface roughness can get transferred to materials etched or deposited later. Here, the surface roughness has led to scumming, which in turn caused lines to get shorted.

January 13, 2023

Modeling of Line and Surface Roughness in Semiconductor Processing


Read more - Modeling of Line and Surface Roughness in Semiconductor Processing
Figure 2. Backside power delivery using buried power rails, based on [2] (not to scale).

Figure 2. Backside power delivery using buried power rails, based on [2] (not to scale).

December 19, 2022

The Other Side of the Wafer: The Latest Developments in Backside Power Delivery


Read more - The Other Side of the Wafer: The Latest Developments in Backside Power Delivery
Figure 1:   3D Gyroscope Model example with simulated pressure contours (left), and ambient cavity pressure vs. Q-factor graph with simulated and measured results (right) (courtesy: Murata)

Figure 1:   3D Gyroscope Model example with simulated pressure contours (left), and ambient cavity pressure vs. Q-factor graph with simulated and measured results (right) (courtesy: Murata)

November 28, 2022

Understanding Q-Factors in Gas Encapsulated MEMS Inertial Sensors


Read more - Understanding Q-Factors in Gas Encapsulated MEMS Inertial Sensors

Comments are closed.

Product Information

  • Product Offerings
  • Technical Support & Training
  • Licensing
  • System Requirements

Resources

  • Blog
  • Case Studies
  • Videos
  • 2018 MEMS Design Contest

Company

  • About
  • Press
  • Partners & Programs
  • Contact
© Copyright Coventor Inc., A Lam Research Company, All Rights Reserved
Privacy Policy • Terms of Use
Contact Us
  • LOG IN
  • REGISTER