• Skip to main content
  • LOG IN
  • REGISTER
Coventor_New_LogoCoventor_New_LogoCoventor_New_LogoCoventor_New_Logo
  • COMPANY
    • ABOUT
    • CAREERS
    • PRESS RELEASE
    • PRESS COVERAGE
    • EVENTS
  • PRODUCTS
    • SEMulator3D®
      Semiconductor Process Modeling
    • CoventorMP®
      MEMS Design Automation
      • CoventorWare®
      • MEMS+®
  • SOLUTIONS
    • SEMICONDUCTOR SOLUTIONS
    • MEMS SOLUTIONS
  • RESOURCES
    • CASE STUDIES
    • BLOG
    • VIDEOS
  • CONTACT
  • SUPPORT
Contact Us
✕
  • Home
  • Coventor Blog
  • Shaking Your World: Using MEMS Seismometers to Monitor Earthquakes
A Fantastic Voyage into Semiconductor Devices
January 4, 2022
Figure 3: DEDED Contour, Level Plot and Output Structure of DOE2
Accelerating Semiconductor Process Development Using Virtual Design of Experiments
February 11, 2022

Shaking Your World: Using MEMS Seismometers to Monitor Earthquakes

Published by Hideyuki Maekoba at January 19, 2022
Categories
  • Coventor Blog
Tags
  • CoventorMP
  • MEMS
  • MEMS Seismometer
  • MEMS+
Fig. 3. Block diagram of the multi-domain simulation. Courtesy of Waseda University, Professor Ikehashi laboratory.

Fig. 3. Block diagram of the multi-domain simulation. Courtesy of Waseda University, Professor Ikehashi laboratory.

In any given year, we expect about 16 major earthquakes worldwide, 15 of which are in the magnitude 7 range and one in the magnitude 8.0 range or greater [1]. As a result, there is high demand for Earthquake Early Warning (EEW) systems. A nationwide EEW system that is managed by the Japanese Meteorological Agency (JMA) has been operating since 2006 [2]. The network is comprised of 1000 seismic stations, spaced 20 to 25km apart. After the 2011 M9.1 Tohoku-Oki earthquake, JMA collected feedback regarding their EEW systems. People were familiar with the earthquake warning systems and found them useful. The participants provided generally positive feedback regarding the JMA EEW system implementation, and were also surprisingly positive about false alarms. The survey respondents were familiar with the technical limitations of the early warning system, and agreed that they preferred having a system that provided false alarms compared to a system that did not issue warnings about an actual earthquake.

Unfortunately, delays can occur between the characterization and detection of a seismic event due to a sparse (or limited) seismic sensor network. One approach to resolve this problem is to supplement traditional sensor networks with MEMS-based seismic sensors. MEMS sensors are small, inexpensive, and suitable for local monitoring, and could be deployed to increase seismic monitoring capabilities. Using MEMS technology and the Internet of Things (IoT), some interesting seismic sensor technologies have already been developed or deployed as part of an early earthquake warning system [3]. The MyShake project in California provides earthquake alerts using smartphones. One of the three EEW systems in Taiwan, the P-alert system developed by National Taiwan University (NTU), uses MEMS sensors to provide onsite warnings more rapidly.

In collaboration with Waseda University, we have recently worked on the design of a sub-1Hz resonance frequency MEMS resonator that can be used in dense seismometer networks [4]. The low resonance frequency of this device is achieved using electrically tunable springs with ultra-small spring constants. For fine-tuning, we have proposed a multi-step electrical tuning method (Fig. 1). The structure of our seismometer is shown in Fig. 2(a), with a top view of the MEMS+® simulated model shown in Figure 2(b). Unfortunately, the small spring constant needed in the design reduces the shock robustness and dynamic range of the seismometer. To improve the shock robustness and enhance the dynamic range, we employ a force-balanced method in which the mass displacement is nulled by a feedback force (Fig. 3). This innovative design has been simulated in MEMS+, and the design can accurately detect input acceleration (a proxy for seismic motion) using a highly compact form factor.

Fig. 1. The basic principle of multi-step electrical tuning. Courtesy of Waseda University, Professor Ikehashi laboratory.

Fig. 1. The basic principle of multi-step electrical tuning. Courtesy of Waseda University, Professor Ikehashi laboratory.

Fig. 2. (a) Schematic of seismometer structure; (b) Top view of the MEMS+ model central structure of the seismometer. Courtesy of Waseda University, Professor Ikehashi laboratory.

Fig. 2. (a) Schematic of seismometer structure; (b) Top view of the MEMS+ model central structure of the seismometer. Courtesy of Waseda University, Professor Ikehashi laboratory.

Fig. 3. Block diagram of the multi-domain simulation. Courtesy of Waseda University, Professor Ikehashi laboratory.

Fig. 3. Block diagram of the multi-domain simulation. Courtesy of Waseda University, Professor Ikehashi laboratory.

The goal of this study has been to develop a sensitive and robust MEMS-based seismometer that could be broadly deployed in Earthquake Early Warning systems. This type of MEMS-based seismometer could provide more accurate earthquake detection with fewer false alarms, helping to save lives. We look forward to our future collaboration with Waseda University, and to the eventual deployment of this advanced seismometer into advanced earthquake warning systems.

Interested in learning more?

Download the full whitepaper “A Sub-1 Hz Resonance Frequency Resonator Enabled by Multi-Step Tuning for Micro-Seismometer” to learn more.

Download Full Paper

 

References:

  1. Available online: https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/why-are-we-having-so-many-earthquakes-has-naturallyoccurring-earthquake-activity-been (accessed on 10 November 2021)
  2. Velazquez, O., Pescaroli, G., Cremen, G., & Galasso, C. (2020). A review of the technical and socio-organizational components of earthquake early warning systems. Frontiers in Earth Science, 8, 445.
  3. Allen, R. M., & Melgar, D. (2019). Earthquake Early Warning: Advances, scientific challenges, and societal needs. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 47, 361-388.
  4. Wu, J., Maekoba, H., Parent, A., & Ikehashi, T. (2022). A Sub-1 Hz Resonance Frequency Resonator Enabled by Multi-Step Tuning for Micro-Seismometer. Micromachines, 13(1), 63.
Share
Hideyuki Maekoba
Hideyuki Maekoba
Hideyuki Maekoba, MS, is a Senior Application Engineer at Coventor, where he supports customers in using the CoventorMP MEMS design product. Mr. Maekoba is an expert in the design and modeling of MEMS devices, including RF MEMS, MEMS resonators and MEMS Inertial Sensors. He received his Master’s Degree in Physics from the University of Tsukuba in Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.

Related posts

Picture of a young man using virtual reality glasses from the 2018 movie “Ready Player One” from Warner Bros.

An Explanation of the Metaverse and 5 MEMS Technologies Solutions That Will Soon Help Make It Happen

January 18, 2023

An Explanation of the Metaverse and 5 MEMS Technologies Solutions That Will Soon Help Make It Happen


Read more - An Explanation of the Metaverse and 5 MEMS Technologies Solutions That Will Soon Help Make It Happen
Figure 4 displays a single image showing how surface roughness can get transferred to materials etched or deposited later. In this image, the surface roughness has led to scumming, which in turn caused lines to get shorted. The figure shows uneven lines due to surface roughness, with material left behind that crosses two of the lines and creates a short.

Figure 4: Surface roughness can get transferred to materials etched or deposited later. Here, the surface roughness has led to scumming, which in turn caused lines to get shorted.

January 13, 2023

Modeling of Line and Surface Roughness in Semiconductor Processing


Read more - Modeling of Line and Surface Roughness in Semiconductor Processing
Figure 2. Backside power delivery using buried power rails, based on [2] (not to scale).

Figure 2. Backside power delivery using buried power rails, based on [2] (not to scale).

December 19, 2022

The Other Side of the Wafer: The Latest Developments in Backside Power Delivery


Read more - The Other Side of the Wafer: The Latest Developments in Backside Power Delivery
Figure 1:   3D Gyroscope Model example with simulated pressure contours (left), and ambient cavity pressure vs. Q-factor graph with simulated and measured results (right) (courtesy: Murata)

Figure 1:   3D Gyroscope Model example with simulated pressure contours (left), and ambient cavity pressure vs. Q-factor graph with simulated and measured results (right) (courtesy: Murata)

November 28, 2022

Understanding Q-Factors in Gas Encapsulated MEMS Inertial Sensors


Read more - Understanding Q-Factors in Gas Encapsulated MEMS Inertial Sensors

Comments are closed.

Product Information

  • Product Offerings
  • Technical Support & Training
  • Licensing
  • System Requirements

Resources

  • Blog
  • Case Studies
  • Videos
  • 2018 MEMS Design Contest

Company

  • About
  • Press
  • Partners & Programs
  • Contact
© Copyright Coventor Inc., A Lam Research Company, All Rights Reserved
Privacy Policy • Terms of Use
Contact Us
  • LOG IN
  • REGISTER