• Skip to main content
  • LOG IN
  • REGISTER
Coventor_New_LogoCoventor_New_LogoCoventor_New_LogoCoventor_New_Logo
  • COMPANY
    • ABOUT
    • CAREERS
    • PRESS RELEASE
    • PRESS COVERAGE
    • EVENTS
  • PRODUCTS
    • SEMulator3D®
      Semiconductor Process Modeling
    • CoventorMP®
      MEMS Design Automation
      • CoventorWare®
      • MEMS+®
  • SOLUTIONS
    • SEMICONDUCTOR SOLUTIONS
    • MEMS SOLUTIONS
  • RESOURCES
    • CASE STUDIES
    • BLOG
    • VIDEOS
  • CONTACT
  • SUPPORT
Contact Us
✕
  • Home
  • Coventor Blog
  • The Challenge of Modeling the Interaction between MEMS Inertial Sensors and their Packaging
Improving Patterning Yield at the 5 nm Semiconductor Node
March 21, 2018
Example of metal connections in Back End of Line (BEOL) development, and highlighted hotspots.
Advanced 3D Design Technology Co-Optimization for Manufacturability
April 13, 2018

The Challenge of Modeling the Interaction between MEMS Inertial Sensors and their Packaging

Published by Arnaud Parent at April 2, 2018
Categories
  • Coventor Blog
Tags
  • CoventorMP
  • MEMS
  • MEMS Inertial Sensors
CoventorMP MEMS design automation flow

Figure 1: CoventorMP MEMS design automation flow

Simulation of Thermal Effects on MEMS Performances

MEMS inertial sensors, such as Accelerometers and Gyroscopes, have been commercially successful in the consumer marketplace, where reduced size and cost are more important than accuracy. These sensors are classified as commercial grade products, even though they are typically used in consumer applications. Today, MEMS inertial sensors are knocking on the door of tactical grade applications, where the requirements for accuracy are much more demanding. MEMS products may one day enter the navigation grade application space, where accuracy demands are even more stringent. To meet the enhanced accuracy and performance requirements of tactical and navigation grade inertial sensors, MEMS designers must not only consider the transducer itself but the interaction of the product with its surrounding environment (starting with the packaging). At Coventor, we have a new simulation platform that can be used to create a compact model of MEMS transducers along with their packaging, providing a method to efficiently study the overall behavior of MEMS inertial sensors.

A Design Flow for Package and Transducer Co-Simulation

The design flow we propose is based upon an important observation. In general, MEMS packages have dimensions that are an order of magnitude (or more) greater in size than the underlying transducer structures. Packages are also geometrically considerably simpler. While a package is generally cubic in shape, a modern inertial sensor can contain hundreds of connected shapes such as comb capacitors, suspension beams and inertial masses. Modeling a MEMS transducer and package together using standard Finite Element Analysis is challenging, especially when considering the coupled-physics between the components of the device.

A solution to this problem is to employ a hybrid approach (Figure 1) like the one used in CoventorMP®. In this approach, the package is simulated using standard CoventorWare® Finite Element Analysis (Figure 1, A) and coupled to a model of the transducer created in MEMS+® (Figure 1, B).  The MEMS+ model contains specialized multi physics finite elements, or “MEMS building blocks”, dedicated to MEMS transducer design. The complete model (transducer and package) can then be simulated within MEMS+ or included in a system or circuit design using MATLAB/Simulink® and Cadence/Spectre® (Figure 1, C).

CoventorMP MEMS design automation flow
Figure 1: CoventorMP MEMS design automation flow

Our Design Flow Applied to a 3-Axis Gyroscope

To obtain the thermo-mechanical behavior of a 3-axis gyroscope package, we simulate its deformation at different temperatures using a CoventorWare FEA model with 110,000 hexahedral, 27-node meshed brick elements. In parallel, we have created a behavioral model of the gyroscope transducer in MEMS+ that consists of multiple interconnected components: shell plates, Bernoulli beams, Timoshenko beams, electrostatic drive and capacitive sensing electrodes. This model is internally represented by fully coupled nonlinear system matrices that support 14k mechanical degrees of freedom (DoF), 10 electrical DoF, 3 angular velocity inputs and 9 capacitance outputs.

MEMS+ gyroscope and package joined – On the left, the assembled complete model (the package deformation is exaggerated) – On the right, thermal deformation results of the 3-axis gyro and die level package at -40°C (transparent package)
Figure 2: MEMS+ gyroscope and package joined – On the left, the assembled complete model (the package deformation is exaggerated) – On the right, thermal deformation results of the 3-axis gyro and die level package at -40°C (transparent package)

We then imported the package deformation data to the MEMS+ behavioral model using a specialized package modeling component. This component ensures that MEMS+ objects in contact with the package are deformed or displaced based upon the nodal, FEA-computed displacement of the package. MEMS+ objects are mechanically deformed or displaced based upon strain and stress applied by the package, and this deformation also impacts the electrostatic  behavior (forces and capacitances) of the device due to surface and gap deformations. The resulting MEMS+ model of the transducer and package is shown in Figure 2.

On the left, capacitance versus temperature for the x-rotation sense electrode. On the right, drive and x-rotation sense resonance frequencies versus temperature
Figure 3: On the left, capacitance versus temperature for the x-rotation sense electrode. On the right, drive and x-rotation sense resonance frequencies versus temperature

With this model, we simulated the behavior of sense capacitances, resonance frequencies and angular velocity rate sensitivity as a function of temperature. Sense Capacitance and Resonance Frequencies show good agreement with actual measurements, while Angular Velocity was not experimentally studied or measured (see Figure 3).

Conclusion

We have presented a solution to simulate a MEMS transducer integrated into its package. This solution has been implemented using CoventorMP, a design automation platform for MEMS designers. CoventorMP enables the co-simulation of multi-physics, geometrically complex structures using an integrated combination of finite element and reduced-order modeling. It is a practical and validated solution to simulate and improve the performance of packaged MEMS products.
We published the results of this analysis at the 2017 Inertial Sensors and Systems conference [1]. If you would like to learn more, please feel free to download our paper or contact us for a demonstration. We’re also keen to hear of any simulation problem that you have – perhaps we can help?

Reference

[1] A. Parent, C. J. Welham, T. Piirainen, A. Blomqvist, Thermo-Mechanical Simulation of Die-Level Packaged 3-axis MEMS Gyroscope Performance, 2017 Inertial Sensors and Systems, Karlsruhe, Germany

Share
Arnaud Parent
Arnaud Parent
Arnaud Parent, Ph.D. is CoventorMP Product Manager and Staff Applications Engineer at Coventor, where he is responsible for technical evaluations, technical customer support and training for Coventor's MEMS design tools. He previously worked at CEA and ONERA in prototype development of MEMS inertial devices. Arnaud received his Ph.D. from Paris-Saclay University (Paris XI).

Related posts

Figure 1 displays a single cell of a conventional DRAM that consists of 2 Word Lines (WLs), a Bit Line (BL) and 2 Storage Node Contacts (SNC) in Figure 1(a). There are 3 images in the figure. The Saddle Fin is produced during the WL etch step (prior to WL metal deposition) and is located below the cell wordline (Figure 1(b), right center inside a yellow dotted circle). The Saddle Fin structure can be seen in detail by making a vertical cut in the wordline direction (Fig.1(b), right). During device simulation, the Saddle Fin performance can be measured by virtually cropping a transistor and adding ports at the Gate, Source and Drain after an SNC Process (Fig.1(c), showing the gate, source and drain).
May 30, 2023

Improving DRAM Device Performance Through Saddle Fin Process Optimization


Read more - Improving DRAM Device Performance Through Saddle Fin Process Optimization
Figure 6 (left to right): Different profiles using pattern dependence for the antenna and sharp head shapes. a) Antenna shape with POR flow (b) Antenna profile with a gate CD of 26nm (c) Sharp head profile with a gate CD of 28nm (d) Sharp head profile with an etch.

Figure 6 (left to right): Different profiles using pattern dependence for the antenna and sharp head shapes. a) Antenna shape with POR flow (b) Antenna profile with a gate CD of 26nm (c) Sharp head profile with a gate CD of 28nm (d) Sharp head profile with an etch.

April 13, 2023

The Impact of Metal Gate Recess Profile on Transistor Resistance and Capacitance


Read more - The Impact of Metal Gate Recess Profile on Transistor Resistance and Capacitance
Figure 1a (left) displays the process of performing Physical Vapor Deposition (PVD), including Cu bombardment and filling of voids. Figure 1b (right) displays the process of performing Ion Beam Etch (IBE), including ion beam bombardment, mask shadowing and etch regions.

Fig 1a Physical Vapor Deposition (PVD); Fig 1b Ion Beam Etch (IBE)

March 22, 2023

A Deposition and Etch Technique to Lower Resistance of Semiconductor Metal Lines


Read more - A Deposition and Etch Technique to Lower Resistance of Semiconductor Metal Lines
Left to right: SEMulator3D virtual structures of NON, Low K and Airgap spacers for a DRAM cell, with highlighted SiO2, Polysilicon, Silicon, Si3N4, TIN and W layers

Fig. 1: (a) NON, (b) Low k and (c) Airgap spacer

February 28, 2023

A Comparative Evaluation of DRAM bit-line spacer integration schemes


Read more - A Comparative Evaluation of DRAM bit-line spacer integration schemes

Comments are closed.

Product Information

  • Product Offerings
  • Technical Support & Training
  • Licensing
  • System Requirements

Resources

  • Blog
  • Case Studies
  • Videos
  • 2018 MEMS Design Contest

Company

  • About
  • Press
  • Partners & Programs
  • Contact
© Copyright Coventor Inc., A Lam Research Company, All Rights Reserved
Privacy Policy • Terms of Use
Contact Us
  • LOG IN
  • REGISTER