• Skip to main content
  • LOG IN
  • REGISTER
Coventor_New_LogoCoventor_New_LogoCoventor_New_LogoCoventor_New_Logo
  • COMPANY
    • ABOUT
    • CAREERS
    • PRESS RELEASE
    • PRESS COVERAGE
    • EVENTS
  • PRODUCTS
    • SEMulator3D®
      Semiconductor Process Modeling
    • CoventorMP®
      MEMS Design Automation
      • CoventorWare®
      • MEMS+®
  • SOLUTIONS
    • SEMICONDUCTOR SOLUTIONS
    • MEMS SOLUTIONS
  • RESOURCES
    • CASE STUDIES
    • BLOG
    • VIDEOS
  • CONTACT
  • SUPPORT
Contact Us
✕
  • Home
  • Coventor Blog
  • 3D NAND: Challenges beyond 96-Layer Memory Arrays
Coventor-August-2018-Blog-Figure-2-Resulting third party software modeling of Y-splitter optical properties.
A Review of Silicon Photonics: Using Process Simulation to Design Silicon Photonics Devices
August 16, 2018
Y-branch structure (SiO2 upper and lower claddings not shown)
Analyzing Worst-Case Silicon Photonic Device Performance Through Process Modeling and Optical Simulation
January 15, 2019

3D NAND: Challenges beyond 96-Layer Memory Arrays

Published by Coventor at October 12, 2018
Categories
  • Coventor Blog
Tags
  • 3D NAND
  • Technology Reviews
3D NAND Memory Array and Key Process Challenges (Source: Lam Research)

Figure 1: 3D NAND Memory Array and Key Process Challenges (Source: Lam Research)

Unlike scaling practices in 2D NAND technology, the direct way to reduce bit costs and increase chip density in 3D NAND is by adding layers. In 2013, Samsung shipped the first V-NAND product using 24 layers and MLC [1]. Five years later, in 2018, vendors of 3D-NAND have all announced production plans for 96-Layer NAND using TLC [2]. According to recent news reports, vendors are already working on next generation 3D NAND that contains even more layers. What are the 3D NAND’s process challenges, and what might be its ceiling, as increasing numbers of layers are used?

3D NAND Memory Array and Key Process Challenges (Source: Lam Research)
Figure 1: 3D NAND Memory Array and Key Process Challenges (Source: Lam Research)

Mold Stacking of Alternative Layers

Mold stacking requires tight uniformity and defect control, minimum in-plane displacement and nitride shrinkage, acceptable wafer bowing after thermal stress, and high nitride/oxide wet etch selectivity for patterning accuracy and electrical performance. Increasing the stacking layers increases the chance for defects (since defects are propagated through the upper layers), magnifies device stress (which can bow or warp wafers), and increases process complexity and management. [4]

Word-Line (WL) Staircase Definition

Multiple WL lithography steps are currently used, with repeated vertical step etching and 2D trimming at each staircase, to provide the “up and down” shape of the WL staircase used in 3D NAND devices.  This series of process steps requires precise etch step profiling, trim etch uniformity and pull-back CD control for the WL contact [3, 4]. As you add more 3D NAND layers at a given cell density, the WL staircase also needs to lengthen and takes more space. For example, in the case of a 32-layer NAND device, the WL staircase stretches out 20um from the edge of the cell array. For a 128-layer architecture, the WL staircase would extend out 80um [2]. Current WL staircase designs may be a key obstacle to cell efficiency and scaling of this type of 3D NAND architecture, due to this linear scaling effect.   Alternative solutions are being proposed to address this issue [5].

(a) Repeated vertical and lateral trim etch to define WL contact pads (b) Resulting "Up and Down" staircase (Sources: Lam Research and Objective Analysis)
Figure 2: (a) Repeated vertical and lateral trim etch to define WL contact pads (b) Resulting “Up and Down” staircase (Sources: Lam Research and Objective Analysis)

High Aspect Ratio (HAR) Memory Channel Etch

Creating the holes needed by memory channels using extreme HAR etch (with an aspect ratio greater than 40) through 90+ NAND layers challenges the physical limits of current plasma etch technologies. More than a trillion holes need to be etched on every wafer.  According to Harmeet Singh at Lam Research, issues include “incomplete etching, bowing, twisting, and CD variation between the top and bottom of the stack. Such defects can lead to shorts, interference between neighboring memory strings, and other performance issues.” [4].  Stacking several decks of memory arrays (e.g. 2 decks of 64-layers to provide an equivalent 128-layer array) may relieve challenges of HAR etch but also impose cost and yield concerns.

Challenges of High Aspect Ratio Etch and Control for 90+ Layers (Source:  Lam Research)
Figure 3: Challenges of High Aspect Ratio Etch and Control for 90+ Layers (Source: Lam Research)

Word-Line (WL) Replacement Gate Fill

Again, according to Harmeet Singh at Lam Research “For replacement-gate schemes, WL tungsten provides the critical conductive links between individual memory cells within layers. This process is particularly challenging because of the need to achieve void-free fill of complex, narrow, lateral structures with minimal stress on the memory stack.” [4]   As Singh also noted, traditional CVD tungsten with high tensile stress can lead to wafer bowing, and fluorine out-diffuse during the process is also known to create yield-limiting defects. A low-fluorine tungsten (LFW) ALD process is a possible current solution [4]. However, tungsten WL thickness requirements (due to resistivity) will limit the thickness that the stack layers (ONON) can be shrunk, resulting in an increasing aspect ratio of the memory hole etch. A new WL metal with low resistivity may be necessary for scaling and increasing the number of layers used in future NAND architectures.

Uniform void-free fill is difficult in deep 3D structures (source:  Lam Research)
Figure 4: Uniform void-free fill is difficult in deep 3D structures (source: Lam Research)

Productivity

With 3D NAND evolving and the cost-per-bit decreasing below the level of 2D NAND, people expect 3D NAND will continue to support the bit growth of Moore’s Law by expanding memory scaling in a vertical direction. However, if this bit growth relies only on an increase in the total number of layers, processing time per wafer could become cost-prohibitive [6].  If the processing time for a wafer expands excessively, the technology will become untenable.  Recently, four-bit-per-cell QLC technology has been announced which provides a 33% capacity boost over three-bit-per-cell 3D NAND [7]. This is one of ways that the industry could relieve capacity growth stress caused by increasing stack height. However, the difficulty of discriminating between 16 possible voltage levels of a QLC memory cell, as compared to the 8 voltage levels of a TLC cell, will impose costs of lower write endurance and performance [7]. It’s doubtful that the industry can keep improving the bit-per-cell number to improve capacity growth, irrespective of the availability of floating gate or charge trapping gate schemes.

In summary, current 3D NAND architecture has several bottlenecks that may limit adding device layers to increase architectural density.   This creates challenges and opportunities for innovative integration solutions as well as innovation in single unit process technologies and tool design.  Let’s see what the next breakthrough will be!

References

[1]  Samsung Starts Mass Producing Industry’s First 32-Layer 3D V-NAND Flash Memory, its 2nd Generation V-NAND Offering, Samsung News

[2] Aton Shilov & Billy Tallis , multiple articles from AnandTech, May – July 2018

[3] Thorsten Lill, “Overcoming Challenges in 3D NAND Volume Manufacturing”, Flash Memory Summit 2017, July 8, 2017

[4] Harmeet Singh, “Overcoming challenges in 3D NAND volume manufacturing”, Solid State Technology, July 27, 2017

[5] Jim Hardy, “How Samsung Will Improve 3D NAND Costs”, The Memory Guy, Aug 27, 2017

[6] Sang-Yung Lee, “What’s Wrong with 3D NAND”, EE Times, June 29, 2017

[7] Tallis, Billy, “Intel And Micron Launch First QLC NAND: Micron 5210 ION Enterprise SATA SSD”, ANANDTECH, May 21, 2018

Share
Coventor
Coventor

Related posts

Picture of a young man using virtual reality glasses from the 2018 movie “Ready Player One” from Warner Bros.

An Explanation of the Metaverse and 5 MEMS Technologies Solutions That Will Soon Help Make It Happen

January 18, 2023

An Explanation of the Metaverse and 5 MEMS Technologies Solutions That Will Soon Help Make It Happen


Read more - An Explanation of the Metaverse and 5 MEMS Technologies Solutions That Will Soon Help Make It Happen
Figure 4 displays a single image showing how surface roughness can get transferred to materials etched or deposited later. In this image, the surface roughness has led to scumming, which in turn caused lines to get shorted. The figure shows uneven lines due to surface roughness, with material left behind that crosses two of the lines and creates a short.

Figure 4: Surface roughness can get transferred to materials etched or deposited later. Here, the surface roughness has led to scumming, which in turn caused lines to get shorted.

January 13, 2023

Modeling of Line and Surface Roughness in Semiconductor Processing


Read more - Modeling of Line and Surface Roughness in Semiconductor Processing
Figure 2. Backside power delivery using buried power rails, based on [2] (not to scale).

Figure 2. Backside power delivery using buried power rails, based on [2] (not to scale).

December 19, 2022

The Other Side of the Wafer: The Latest Developments in Backside Power Delivery


Read more - The Other Side of the Wafer: The Latest Developments in Backside Power Delivery
Figure 1:   3D Gyroscope Model example with simulated pressure contours (left), and ambient cavity pressure vs. Q-factor graph with simulated and measured results (right) (courtesy: Murata)

Figure 1:   3D Gyroscope Model example with simulated pressure contours (left), and ambient cavity pressure vs. Q-factor graph with simulated and measured results (right) (courtesy: Murata)

November 28, 2022

Understanding Q-Factors in Gas Encapsulated MEMS Inertial Sensors


Read more - Understanding Q-Factors in Gas Encapsulated MEMS Inertial Sensors

Comments are closed.

Product Information

  • Product Offerings
  • Technical Support & Training
  • Licensing
  • System Requirements

Resources

  • Blog
  • Case Studies
  • Videos
  • 2018 MEMS Design Contest

Company

  • About
  • Press
  • Partners & Programs
  • Contact
© Copyright Coventor Inc., A Lam Research Company, All Rights Reserved
Privacy Policy • Terms of Use
Contact Us
  • LOG IN
  • REGISTER