• Skip to main content
  • LOG IN
  • REGISTER
Coventor_New_LogoCoventor_New_LogoCoventor_New_LogoCoventor_New_Logo
  • COMPANY
    • ABOUT
    • CAREERS
    • PRESS RELEASE
    • PRESS COVERAGE
    • EVENTS
  • PRODUCTS
    • SEMulator3D®
      Semiconductor Process Modeling
    • CoventorMP®
      MEMS Design Automation
      • CoventorWare®
      • MEMS+®
  • SOLUTIONS
    • SEMICONDUCTOR SOLUTIONS
    • MEMS SOLUTIONS
  • RESOURCES
    • CASE STUDIES
    • BLOG
    • VIDEOS
  • CONTACT
  • SUPPORT
Contact Us
✕
  • Home
  • Coventor Blog
  • FinFETs Give Way to Gate-All-Around
Fig. 6: Channel leakage profile from the fin surface to the fin center at different sidewall angle splits.
Micro Loading and its Impact on Device Performance: A Wiggling Active Area Case in an Advanced DRAM Process
October 23, 2020
  Figure 2:  SEMulator3D identifies device electrodes in a 3D structure and simulates device characteristics similar to TCAD software, but without the need for time-consuming TCAD modeling.
Process Window Optimization of DRAM by Virtual Fabrication
December 14, 2020

FinFETs Give Way to Gate-All-Around

Published by Coventor at November 16, 2020
Categories
  • Coventor Blog
Tags
  • FinFET
  • Nanosheet
  • Technology Reviews
Lam_GAA_10.26.20_sq

When they were first commercialized at the 22 nm node, finFETs represented a revolutionary change to the way we build transistors, the tiny switches in the “brains” of a chip. As compared to prior planar transistors, the fin, contacted on three sides by the gate, provides much better control of the channel formed within the fin. But, finFETs are already reaching the end of their utility as challenges mount at the 5- and 3-nm nodes.

Lam_GAA_InArticle1_10.26.20

The Challenges of Transistor Scaling

With every node, device manufacturers scale transistors to deliver both a performance boost and power reduction at lower device area and cost – commonly referred to as PPAC (power, performance, area, cost) scaling. However, further reduction in finFET dimensions leads to limitations in the drive current and electrostatic control.

In planar transistors, the width of the channel could be increased to drive more current and switch on and off faster. However, evolution of CMOS designs to standard cells with lower track height means that there is less flexibility in fin dimensions. Single-fin devices at sub-5 nm nodes will be unable to provide enough drive current.

Furthermore, although three sides of the fin are controlled by the gate, there remains one side that isn’t controlled. As the gate length is reduced, it leads to greater short channel effects and more leakage through the uncontacted bottom of the device, and, as a result, smaller devices can’t meet power and performance goals.

Replacing Fins with Nanosheets

Gate-all-around, or GAA transistors, are a modified transistor structure where the gate contacts the channel from all sides and enables continued scaling. Such transistors are referred to as gate-all-around, or GAA, transistors, and different variants have been proposed.

Early GAA devices will use vertically-stacked nanosheets. They are constructed of separate horizontal sheets, surrounded by gate materials on all sides. This provides improved channel control relative to finFETs. Unlike finFETs, where higher current requires multiple side-by-side fins, the current-carrying capacity of GAA transistors is increased by stacking a few nanosheets vertically, with gate material wrapped around the channels. The nanosheet dimensions can be scaled so that transistors can be sized for the specific performance required.

However, as with fins, the width and spacing of the sheets will drop as the technology scales and as our ability to print finer features continues to improve. At some point, the width of the sheet may be roughly the same as the thickness – at which point they resemble nanowires.

Lam_GAA_InArticle2_10.26.20

Manufacturing Challenges

Nanosheets may be simple in concept, but they present new challenges for manufacturing. Some of those challenges revolve around fabricating the structure; others involve new materials needed to achieve PPAC scaling targets.

The main construction challenges arise as a result of the complex structure being built. The GAA transistors are fabricated by first growing a superlattice of alternating Si and SiGe epitaxial layers, which form the basis for the nanosheets. Critical steps include deposition of an inner dielectric spacer to protect the source/drain regions and define the gate width, as well as the channel release etch to remove the sacrificial layers. That space left by removal of the sacrificial layers then needs to be filled with the gate dielectric and metal including between the nanosheets. New materials are likely to be introduced for the gate metal. Cobalt is being evaluated by some manufacturers, with ruthenium, molybdenum, nickel, and various alloys under consideration.

Lam_GAA_InArticle3_10.26.20

Continued Evolution

GAA transistors will be the successors to FinFETs, with nanosheets evolving to nanowires. These GAA structures should carry through the advanced process nodes currently on the roadmap.

Transistor structures have come a long way from the early planar architectures. Those early pioneers would have been astounded at the evolution, and at the incredible smart and connected world they have enabled. We look forward to seeing what new end-user devices and capabilities the gate-all-around transistor will bring.

Courtesy of Lam Research. (author:  Nerissa Draeger, Ph.D.)

Share
Coventor
Coventor

Related posts

Picture of a young man using virtual reality glasses from the 2018 movie “Ready Player One” from Warner Bros.

An Explanation of the Metaverse and 5 MEMS Technologies Solutions That Will Soon Help Make It Happen

January 18, 2023

An Explanation of the Metaverse and 5 MEMS Technologies Solutions That Will Soon Help Make It Happen


Read more - An Explanation of the Metaverse and 5 MEMS Technologies Solutions That Will Soon Help Make It Happen
Figure 4 displays a single image showing how surface roughness can get transferred to materials etched or deposited later. In this image, the surface roughness has led to scumming, which in turn caused lines to get shorted. The figure shows uneven lines due to surface roughness, with material left behind that crosses two of the lines and creates a short.

Figure 4: Surface roughness can get transferred to materials etched or deposited later. Here, the surface roughness has led to scumming, which in turn caused lines to get shorted.

January 13, 2023

Modeling of Line and Surface Roughness in Semiconductor Processing


Read more - Modeling of Line and Surface Roughness in Semiconductor Processing
Figure 2. Backside power delivery using buried power rails, based on [2] (not to scale).

Figure 2. Backside power delivery using buried power rails, based on [2] (not to scale).

December 19, 2022

The Other Side of the Wafer: The Latest Developments in Backside Power Delivery


Read more - The Other Side of the Wafer: The Latest Developments in Backside Power Delivery
Figure 1:   3D Gyroscope Model example with simulated pressure contours (left), and ambient cavity pressure vs. Q-factor graph with simulated and measured results (right) (courtesy: Murata)

Figure 1:   3D Gyroscope Model example with simulated pressure contours (left), and ambient cavity pressure vs. Q-factor graph with simulated and measured results (right) (courtesy: Murata)

November 28, 2022

Understanding Q-Factors in Gas Encapsulated MEMS Inertial Sensors


Read more - Understanding Q-Factors in Gas Encapsulated MEMS Inertial Sensors

Comments are closed.

Product Information

  • Product Offerings
  • Technical Support & Training
  • Licensing
  • System Requirements

Resources

  • Blog
  • Case Studies
  • Videos
  • 2018 MEMS Design Contest

Company

  • About
  • Press
  • Partners & Programs
  • Contact
© Copyright Coventor Inc., A Lam Research Company, All Rights Reserved
Privacy Policy • Terms of Use
Contact Us
  • LOG IN
  • REGISTER